Yet Another Example Of Crony Capitalism Shows Itself

Crony capitalism has always been a problem, both here and in other countries. As much as I would like to think that here in the US that it's primarily a problem involving Democrats, I know that it cuts across all political lines. The latest example of that is the recent singing of a bipartisan bill by Michigan's Republican Governor Rick Snyder that makes it illegal for any automaker to sell vehicles through any outlet other than franchised dealers.

The so-called Anti-Tesla Bill, named after Elon Musk's Tesla Motors, prevents Tesla from selling its cars in Michigan unless the purchase and delivery is made by a dealer. In other words, they have to use the same old tired method all of the other auto companies have used since the dawn of the mass produced car. The problem: the old way of doing things is inefficient, adds cost, and requires middlemen to handle all of the sales. Tesla wants to sell through company owned showrooms, much like Apple sells most of their products. The legacy automakers are using legislation to prevent newcomers from taking a piece of their pie by forcing them into using the old and inefficient method of selling cars. It's a perfect example of crony capitalism. Rather than beating them through competition they beat them through lawmaking.

The Michigan bill, originally focused on franchise-dealership fees, included a last-minute amendment addressing direct-to-consumer auto sales through manufacturer-owned showrooms. That amendment, added by Republican State Senator Joe Hume, was tossed onto the bill at the very last minute, a procedural loophole that meant the amendment never underwent public comment or debate on the State Senate floor. Michigan Governor Rick Snyder just signed the bill into law.

Snyder, also a Republican, is up for re-election in a couple of weeks. If he didn’t sign the bill, he would have likely faced an immediate onslaught of attack ads paid for by Michigan’s auto dealers—something that would not have helped his cause in a race he leads by a slim margin.

“Not content with enshrining their ability to charge consumers dubious fees, on the last day of the legislative session, the dealers managed to make a last-minute change to the bill in an attempt to cement their broader retail monopoly,” Tesla said in a statement. “Using a procedure that prevented legislators and the public at large from knowing what was happening or allowing debate, Senator Joe Hune added new language in an attempt to lock Tesla out of the state.” Tesla’s statement goes on to point out that the Michigan Automobile Dealers Association is one of State Senator Hune's top financial backers.

The auto industry isn't the only businesses trying to prevent new ways of doing things. All one needs to do is look at the tactics of the taxi industry in their efforts to kill competition from companies like Uber and Lyft. Heaven forbid someone comes along that can do the job better, faster, and less expensively than the existing taxi companies. Rather than making changes to compete with the newcomers they're trying to get cities and states to ban these competitors entirely. That alone tells me that any such legislation should not be passed, and if passed, should be vetoed. The taxi companies have no inherent right to continue to exist if competition enters the market and provides better service. If the taxi companies can't evolve in order to stay in business, then they shouldn't stay in business.

These are but two examples of the rent-seeking and crony capitalism that infests government at all levels. Unless we can find a way to do away with it, we will become no better than so many other nations where cronyism runs rampant and cripples economic growth.


Blatant Voter Fraud In Arizona

There's voter fraud, and then there's voter fraud.

We've heard of stuffing ballot boxes, but it's usually done in a back room somewhere. Apparently this jerk in Maricopa County, Arizona either didn't know that or didn't care, doing it in front of a poll monitor and mouthing off at him while doing so.

An Arizona county party official said he saw a man stuffing “hundreds” of ballots into the ballot box and later told a local news outlet the entire incident was caught on surveillance video. 

“A person wearing a Citizens for a Better Arizona T-shirt dropped a large box of hundreds of early ballots on the table and started stuffing the ballot box as I watched in amazement,” said A.J. LaFaro, chairman of the Maricopa County Republican Party.

Here's the video of the miscreant committing voter fraud. He's committing a felony. He's also wearing a tee-shirt emblazoned with Citizens for a Better Arizona across its front, an organization that has worked to marginalize Republicans in the state.


Thoughts On A Sunday

The last of the foliage is changing from green to yellow and orange, meaning we're at or just past peak color here on the south side of Lake Winnpesaukee. The on-again/off-again sun and rain certainly made performing yesterday's chore a little problematic, but it didn't stop them from getting finished.

I believe with this on/off weather that the last of the warmer weather is gone and the cooler fall temps will now prevail.

At least we get our first delivery of firewood in a little less than two weeks. It will be about that time I'll start sealing up some of the windows in preparation for winter.


Talk about cognitive dissonance!

After decades of promoting equal rights between the genders, and having de facto achieved it, the radical feminists are now claiming in a backhanded manner that women aren't really equal and never will be because they're too weak to say 'No” to sex.

Really? Almost 100 years of progress towards equality between the sexes and now they're saying, in effect, that women aren't equal and are incapable of being equal.

These crazies have got to get their stories straight.


I agree with Ron Fournier on this one: We don't need an 'Ebola czar'.

All of this should be handled by the President, and if not him, his national security advisers, his cabinet, the CDC and/or FEMA. We don't need yet another unvetted Obama yes-man to further muddy the waters. There is an already established chain of command when dealing with such issues, but it appears that yet again the President doesn't want to deal with the explicit duties of his office. Instead he's doing the equivalent of outsourcing the work to a crony with no security or medical background.

And he wonders why nobody trusts him anymore.


First we have to worry about low information voters. Next, we have to worry about low information media employees, in this case CBS staffer Katy Conrad.

From the Instapundit post linking to this comes the best comment of all: “The sad part of it all is that Dr. Paul is more qualified to talk about ebola than the administration’s ebola czar.”



It appears some of our less mature residents here in the southwestern corner of New Hampshire decided it would be a good idea to party hearty, consume too much alcohol, and then riot.

The annual Keene Pumpkin Festival is usually an excuse for Keene State College students to party, and for the most part things do not get out of hand. This time was different.

While visitors were in the downtown area enjoying the festivities, a few blocks away hundreds of college students turned an otherwise festive event into a violent confrontation with police, hurling rocks and battles at both police and each other.

All it takes is immaturity with an added dash of illicit alcohol and things turn ugly.


The always insightful KC Johnson asks and answers the question “Is Left Losing Its Mind Over Campus Sex?”

Unfortunately the brief answer is “Yes.”

Basically the colleges should tell the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights to “bugger off”, stating as a reason that they will not be a party to the denial of constitutional rights of students accused of vaguely defined sexual assault just because some self-important bureaucrat in Washington is telling they have to.

As we have already seen, an increasing number of colleges and universities are running afoul of the Law of Unintended Consequences, being sued by male students who were expelled or otherwise sanctioned without due process and no recourse for appeal. This will cost those institutions of higher learning millions and further damage their reputations.

(H/T Instapundit)


From direct experience I know this to be true.

According to a Pew Research Center study, Republicans are more informed than Democrats.

What makes this even more interesting is that the Pew Center is a left-leaning organization.


If you think Obama is bad now, wait until after the midterm elections.

Between immigration, increasing health insurance premiums, more health insurance cancellations, naming a new Attorney General, the release of the Army's Bergdahl investigation findings, and telling us jjust how dangerous ebola really is, the President is going to drop a ton of these after election bombs on us and Congress.

(H/T Pirate's Cove)


Considering the black vote is very important to Democrats, the only hope they have of retaining a majority in the Senate, many believe the Democrats will turn the race-baiting rhetoric up to “11”.

I'm not sure, but I think their race card has hit its limit and can no longer be used by the Democrat Party. But that won't stop them from trying to inflame racial tensions, even if it means making stuff up.

One example of that is the latest NYT piece about the Michael Brown shooting in Ferguson, MO that has so many holes in it that if it were a boat it would sink right to the bottom. It is an inflammatory piece whose sole purpose is to stir up racial tensions.


Another tactic being used by the Democrats to get out the vote is the now long-in-the-tooth “War on Women” meme. The problem is that very few are buying it, particularly women.

Are women wising up to Democrats? Certainly, they must understand just how bad Obama’s policies have been for them, particularly economically. It’s all nice and good to push the “pay gap”, among others, but like so many other memes Obama and the Democrats push, it has become extremely patronizing, showing a belief that women aren’t competent enough, are too delicate and fragile, are simply hot house flowers who need to be Taken Care Of by government. The rhetoric emanating from Obama and Democrats positions is unempowering for women. The economy under Obama has been less than good for women (well, most Americans).

Women still tend to do most of the shopping and cooking. They see the price rises. They see the buying power of their money decreasing. They have real world concerns. Yet, Obama and the Dems patronize them, and apparently think things like free contraception, sterilization, and abortion are the top issues for women.

The Democrats haven't quite figured out that the facts have overcome their rhetoric and that the very people they're trying to get to vote for them aren't listening anymore.


David Starr has a small bit of advice for those of you out there with built-in webcams on their laptops (this also applies to tablets, phablets, and smart phones: cover the camera with tape when you're not using it.


By way of a rather convoluted series of links starting at Maggie's Farm, the Assistant Village Idiot, and finally to the Wall Street Journal comes this quote from Roger Scruton's new book, HowTo Be A Conservative:

Conservatism starts from a sentiment that all mature people can readily share: the sentiment that good things are easily destroyed, but not easily created. This is especially true of the good things that come to us as collective assets: peace, freedom, law, civility, public spirit, the security of property and family life, in all of which we depend on the cooperation of others while having no means singlehandedly to obtain it. In respect of such things, the work of destruction is quick, easy and exhilarating; the work of creation is slow, laborious and dull. That is one of the lessons of the twentieth century. It is also one reason why conservatives suffer such a disadvantage when it comes to public opinion. Their position is true but boring, that of their opponents exciting but false.

Yup. I'd say that's pretty much spot on. While I don't usually agree with Scruton on many issues, on this particular one I do.


And that's the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where the fall weather has finally arrived in spades, the temperatures are falling, and the last of the boats are being pulled from their summer berths.


The GOP Has Succumbed To The Ideology Of Ayn Rand? Really?

This was my response to a dyed-in-the-wool progressive academician's treatise on how the GOP has succumbed to the ideology of Ayn Rand in a recent edition of our local newspaper.

George, I may just as easily make the case that the Democrat Party as I knew it in my youth has been suborned by the followers of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin. The actions taken by Democrats at all levels over the past five or six decades and the deconstruction and rewriting of American history by 'progressive' academics to make it seem that America is the source of all the world's ills is right out of Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto. The push to make everyone except the nomenklatura slaves to The State, to make them less human and nothing more than cogs in an authoritarian state has been slowly coming to fruition. While many of the people who have been working towards this goal won't call themselves Marxists or Communists, or worse, don't even realize that's what they've become, they seem perfectly fine with the idea, not understanding that it once the downfall of America is completed, they will become redundant and will join the ranks of 'cogs'.

Ayn Rand warned of the dangers of this backhanded push towards Karl Marx's 'dream'. She had lived under socialism and saw it for what it was: a jealous, capricious, and psychopathic god who would brook no dissent, did NOT have the best interests of the citizens at heart, and had no problems killing millions to 'cleanse' the land of dissenters. She saw the creeping spread of government control over all aspects of our lives here in the US as a danger and tried to express those dangers in books like The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged.

All that aside, these are some of things I have learned from direct observation during my decades on this planet:

-Government isn't the answer to all our problems. More often than not, it is the cause.

-Government, particularly at the national level, isn't competent to deal with regional issues.

-Government at the national level has made the mistake of forcing one-size-fits-all solutions to problems that exist in only one area of the nation or in one segment of our society, usually to the detriment of far more people than it's trying to help.

-Government is an inertia laden monster, inefficient, and quite often working at cross-purposes with itself.

-Government at the national and state level becomes beholden to cronies and lobbyists, regardless of the parties in power. The Left always likes to decry the 'influence' of the Koch brothers, but conveniently ignore the even greater influence of George Soros - a convicted felon and self-proclaimed socialist - and Tom Steyer, each who have spent many times the amount of money to push candidates and legislation that benefits them. The Democrats are merely their errand boys. At least the Koch brothers have created thousands of jobs and have supported candidates in both parties. That can't be said for either Soros or Steyer.

-Whenever someone makes the claim “The government simply MUST do 'X'!” it is usually a sign that it's something the government shouldn't do at all, or should at least take the time to look closely at it and then decide some time later if it should do anything at all.

-Government, particularly at the national level, is no more smarter or wiser than the average American. So what makes people, specifically Progressives, think that government is competent enough or wise enough to run anyone else's lives? The people in government have a tough enough time running their own.

-Government, at all levels, usually makes the mistake of ignoring human nature and at times tries to change it. By doing so, it will always fail. Then the Law of Unintended Consequences comes into play, usually to the detriment of the people.

I could go on ad nauseum, but I doubt that any of it would change your mind or entice you to explore your own beliefs, away from like-minded folk who will merely inhibit your ability to question those beliefs and look at them dispassionately and with logic.

So endith the lesson.

NOTE:This response won't appear in the local paper until either Tuesday or Wednesday next.


Gee, Someone At The New Republic Gets It!

In a surprising piece that appeared in The New Republic, a staunchly liberal publication, Judith Shulevitz, a senior editor at TNR has penned a piece that looks at the tidal wave of college sexual assault policies that are denying college students, particularly male college students, due process when it comes to allegations of sexual assault.

Writes Shulevitz:

This August, Columbia University released a new policy for handling “gender-based” misconduct among students. Since April, universities around the country have been rewriting their guidelines after a White House task force urged them to do more to fight sexual assault. I was curious to know what a lawyer outside the university system would make of one of these codes. So I sent the document to Robin Steinberg, a public defender and a feminist.

A few hours later, Steinberg wrote back in alarm. She had read the document with colleagues at the Bronx legal-aid center she runs. They were horrified, she said—not because Columbia still hadn’t sufficiently protected survivors of assault, as some critics charge, but because its procedures revealed a cavalier disregard for the civil rights of people accused of rape, assault, and other gender-based crimes. “We are never sending our boys to college,” she wrote.

Columbia’s safeguards for the accused are better than most. For instance, it allows both accuser and accused to have a lawyer at a hearing, and, if asked, will locate free counsel. By contrast, Harvard, which issued a new code in July, holds investigations but not hearings and does not offer to obtain independent legal assistance. But Steinberg, like most people, hadn’t realized how far the rules governing sexual conduct on campus have strayed from any commonsense understanding of justice.

This isn't the first time someone who should know better finds the rules being put forth due to pressure from the Department of Education's Office of Civil Rights violate long established constitutional protections. The college procedures are tantamount to kangaroo courts where the verdict is already known before any formal hearings have taken place and the accused has no right to defend himself, to view any evidence, or question the accuser or any witnesses.

Now that the cognoscenti are becoming aware of the unconstitutional madness that is infesting college campuses across the nation, I have a feeling more of them are going to be rethinking their donations and endowments to their alma mater. I think they will come to believe as I and many others that sending your children to college is tantamount to child abuse.

Will it end the madness? Not any time soon. As long as the Obamabots still fill many of the positions within the various levels of the administration, it will continue. Or worse, someone will end up seriously hurt or dead due to the Dear Colleague letter and the push by the White House to solve a problem that doesn't really exist. College administrators and government officials behind this will need to go to prison before this idiocy ends. Or colleges will have to see enrollment drop off and the tuition funds that go with them disappear before they realize they went along with this witch hunt (that's what it is, after all) and it's going to cost them millions in lost revenues. Heck, some might even have to close their doors. They certainly won't be the first to have done so.


Thoughts On A Sunday

The foliage season is in full swing, with hordes of leaf peepers crowding the roads all throughout this part of New Hampshire.

On Friday morning while on my way to attend a meeting in a neighboring town I counted almost two dozen sightseeing buses making their way along the southern shore of Lake Winnipesaukee. (You can see a wide expanse of foliage on the opposite shore and covering the mountains on the north side of the lake, with reflections from the water enhancing the effect.)

I don't mind seeing the leaf peepers as they're only here for a week or two, tops, leaving millions of dollars behind them when they leave. They generally aren't annoying like 'summah people' (not to be confused with summerfolk). They love being here. They aren't overly demanding. They go home.


I've thought right from the get go that bringing Ebola patients back to the US for treatment wasn't necessarily a good idea. That a US health care worker has apparently been infected with Ebola while taking care of Ebola patient Thomas Eric Duncan in Dallas. Despite all of the precautions taken, a nurse has been diagnosed with Ebola.

Frankly, that it is happening, both here and in Africa, tells me the precautions being taken aren't enough. Either there has been a breakdown in the procedures being used to prevent infection or the means of transmission has shifted. Of the two, the second is the scariest because if there's a new means of infection we're unaware of this could easily spread despite our best efforts.


With ISIS making gains in Syria, threatening to overrun yet another town near the Turkish border, it has become apparent the air campaign isn't the solution to the problem.

As the military has been saying again and again, the only way to deal with ISIS is on the ground, meaning boots on the ground. Anyone with any understanding of military history understands this. You can't win a ground war from the air.

I must back up a little bit to clarify one point. It is possible to win a ground war from the air, but the means of doing so is brutal and the cost in human lives very high: bomb every stronghold, every village, town, and city to rubble, and then bomb it again, then again. Kill every living being in the area. Leave no stone standing upon stone. Leave nothing and no one alive. But that means killing all the innocents along with the ISIS combatants. Are we willing to do that? Or should we get boots on the ground and dig 'em out street by street and house by house?

I have a feeling that at some point (after the election) the President is going to come to that conclusion and we'll be sending our men and women yet again into harm's way.


The OECD has found that my home state of New Hampshire is the safest state to live in, with one of the reasons being its low crime rate. Then again, many Granite Staters are armed and know how to use their firearms.


I have been trying to stay away from our local TV channels because the deluge of campaign ads have gotten worse, something I thought was impossible. These days we DVR everything we want to watch and then skip through the ads.

Most regular TV ads are OK, but the campaign ads are annoying, condescending, outright lies, distortions, and..umm...annoying. (Yes, I know I listed annoying twice, but that's how bad they are.)

November 4th can't get here soon enough.


Yeah, like this was a bright idea.

If this 17-year old idiot had damaged the quarterback's vision one has to wonder if his parents would have to sell everything they own to pay off the damages from a lawsuit? Then again, not too many 17-year olds think about the consequences of their actions, do they?


This is my kind of salad!


Smitty delves into the Lefty worldview. It all boils down to this:

(a) You are stupid meat.
(b) You can be controlled by hormonal appeal.
(c) If not (a) or (b), you must be silenced.
(d) Because #Power.

How long before they “fire up the ovens and kick in some doors”?

As one commenter opined, “Look at what they do and how they live, not at what they say and you can never go wrong.”



Two Austrian teen girls who decided to join ISIS have found out it's not all fun and games. Now they're stuck in Syria, married, pregnant, and under the control of extremist Muslims who will have no problems beheading them once their children are born and weaned because they want to abandon their husbands and return to Austria.

As they're learning, actions have consequences, particularly actions that have no thought or knowledge behind them.


The Warmists are still claiming AGW will cause all kinds of extreme weather and that it already has. Too bad NOAA has demolished that claim with, of all things, actual data showing just the opposite has been occurring.

Don't worry. I'm sure the warmists will come up with an explanation, just like they've been explaining the the now 18 year+ pause in global warming.


The A/C units were pulled out of the windows in The Manse, a next-to-the-last concession that the warm weather is pretty much done for the year. The last concession will be when I pull the screens from the storm doors and replace them with the glass. I figure that day will come soon enough.


While many Democrats keep trying to push the idea that Obamacare is “working”, a Gallup poll shows nearly half of Americans believe it will make health care worse in the long run.

Once the employer mandate kicks in after the first of the year, I expect those numbers to climb. We haven't seen anywhere near the pain Obamacare is going to inflict on the American public, and once the employer mandate kicks in, everyone will know for sure Obamacare was a godawful law and will, like Prohibition, push for its repeal.

(H/T Viking Pundit)


And that's the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where the leaves are getting close to peak color, the leaf peepers are leaving piles of cash behind, and where the last vestiges of summer past are fading away.


Yes Means Yes - We Don't Need A Stupid Law To Tell Us Otherwise

As we know from history, it is true that quite often that trends and fads that start in California spread to the rest of the nation. Sometimes this has been a good thing. Other times it has been a bad thing. And at yet other times it is neither good or bad, merely benign.

Unfortunately, one trend that started in the Golden State is threatening to infect the rest of the nation, trying to legislate the elimination of common sense and bringing know-nothing and deluded 'do-gooders' into the dorm rooms and bedrooms of college students.

In this case it's New Hampshire State Representative Renny Cushing (D- Rockingham County District 21) has proposed legislation almost identical to California's Affirmative Consent law that governs the sexual activity of college students on and off campus.

I'm sorry, but that's just plain stupid.

How Rep. Cushing thinks it's a good idea escapes me. It's certainly bad legislation and the fact that California was stupid enough to pass it is a strong indication that it should die aborning here. This type of law is crossing the line and getting directly involved in an issue that is not as important or pressing as some of the perpetually offended gender-hustlers have been trying to tell us it is. I go buy the philosophy of Robert Heinlein when he stated that anything that someone claims “Must be done now!” is something that usually needs not be done at all. Goodness knows we've seen that from the present occupant of the White House when he's emphatically stated that “This, that, and the other thing must be done 'Right Away'.”

There are a couple of things that may prevent this incredibly ignorant piece of legislation from ever seeing the light of day: the state legislature does not reconvene until January, meaning it's possible Cushing won't be re-elected to the New Hampshire House on November 4th,or; if he is re-elected it will die in committee being deemed as “inexpedient to legislate” because it's incredibly intrusive and, quite possibly, unconstitutional, at least under the New Hampshire State Constitution.

But should the worst happen and this bad law pass, then that indicates to me that my home state is doomed to become nothing but another bastion of liberal groupthink and the perpetual victimization of one group of people after another as a means of erasing our rights “for the common good.”


A Palate Cleanser

I needed to take a cuteness break, and this certainly qualifies.


These People Are Nuts

There's so much I could write about this story I'm not sure where I would start.

The one thing the Left likes to use as a sledgehammer is the Precautionary Principle, using it as an excuse to severely curtain or outright ban activities they deem as risky. The problem is that there's little they don't find risky, whether it's truly a risk or merely perceived that way.

A perfect example of this: Schools ban swings because everything is dangerous.

Swings? Seriously?

Let's face it, kids like to play. They always have. The want to get dirty. They want to swing from jungle gyms. They want to go down slides. The want to see how high they can get on a swing.

However, under the Precautionary Principle, all of those activities can lead to possible injuries, whether it's a slight bruise, a scraped knee, or some other kind of boo boo, and because of that they must all be banned “For The Children.”

But being a kid is risky. No matter how much the Left thinks we have to remove all risk, it is impossible to do so. That doesn't stop them from trying. However the downside is that by doing so they create other risks they choose to ignore, the two most prevalent being childhood obesity (no play = no physical activity) and neurosis, where children may come to fear everything which will also make them fearful adults. (Hmm. Maybe that explains it all. The Left are all children of parents who saw danger at every corner and didn't let them play like other kids. Now that they're grownups they're getting even with Mommy and Daddy by making sure no one can ever play again. Yeah, I know it's a psychological shot in the dark, but maybe there's a kernel of truth in there somewhere.)

I'm wondering how long it's going to take before these Nervous Nellies make it impossible for kids to be kids. Not long is my guess.


Please Don't Vote

This was inspired by David Harsanyi's piece in Reason with the same title. His reasoning for encouraging people not to vote is different from mine, though there are a few common threads.


We're not far away from Election Day and there's one topic I must discuss that can have an effect on us all: voting.

I am not going to harangue you to exercise your constitutional right and vote. Nope. Not me.

Instead I am going to ask you to think about the upcoming elections in your/town/city/state, about the candidates running for office, and to ponder any ballot initiatives that may also be on the ballot. Then after taking all of those things into account I want you to consider a drastic action: Don't vote.

“But....but, but why?” you may ask.

It's simple, really. It's not that I think you should boycott election day. I don't.

It's not that I think it's a waste of time. It isn't.

It's not that I think you don't have the right to vote. I believe you do.

It's that far too many voters don't have a friggin' clue about who or what they're voting for or against. They don't know the candidates running, particularly for city, county, or state offices. They don't know anything about the various ballot initiatives that may be on the ballot and a few moments pondering them in the voting both can't possibly impart any knowledge about the pluses or minuses about them or any of the unintended consequences of such initiatives. They go in blind, vote, and feel better about themselves for a few minutes before moving on with their lives. They have little idea what or who they've voted for and then they're surprised when the candidate they elected hoses the electorate or the initiative they voted on has consequences that cause problems far beyond its intentions.

What it comes down to is ignorant voters cause havoc far beyond anything anyone could possibly imagine. People we wouldn't otherwise trust end up in office and then screw things up. Ballot initiatives cause problems or costs money that wasn't allocated or boosts taxes in unexpected ways.

It comes down to this: If you don't know who to vote for, then don't for anyone. If you don't know how you should vote on a ballot initiative because you don't know about the issue, then don't vote on it either way. If there's only one race you're interested in or you know who you want to vote for , and more importantly why, then vote for that person. Otherwise leave the rest of the ballot blank. There's no law that says you have to cast a vote for every office or ballot initiative.

When Election Day arrives and you haven't followed the campaigns of anyone running for office or don't have a clue about any of the ballot initiatives, then I must make this appeal to you: Please don't vote. You're not doing yourself or anyone else any favors and you'll just screw it up for everyone else.