4/06/2025

Thoughts On A Sunday

It’s a 50:50 weekend here at the lake, at least when it comes to the weather. Cool and rainy on Saturday and a little warmer and partly sunny on Sunday. This weather is certainly having an effect on the ice covering the lake. It’s pretty thin with a number of areas of open water getting larger. One of the indicators of Ice Out – declared when all 5 ports of call for the MS Mount Washington cruise ship are free of ice – is one of the ponds here in our town. In general, when it is finally free of ice it means Ice Out will occur about two weeks later. It was ice free as of Thursday so that indicates Ice Out may occur on April 17th. Only time will tell.

I did suffer a bit of trauma today, said trauma being filing my income taxes. It looks like I have my withholding set up properly as I should be receiving just under $200 as a refund. (I don’t like over-withholding as it means the federal government gets to use my money interest-free. I’d rather have it in my accounts rather than the Feddle Gummint’s accounts.)

Now that I’ve got that out of my way I can focus on the incipient property taxes on The Gulch which will be due in June.

==+++++==


In relation to yesterday’s post comes this by way of BattleSwarm Blog: DOGE Discovers Giant Social Security Fraud.

One small excerpt:

Musk told the audience with Gracias on stage that DOGE found “20 million dead people marked as alive… Social Security database, this is too crazy, and then you’ll notice there’s a strange trend here.”

If each one of those 20 million people received $20,000 in benefits (Social Security, Medicare, and/or Medicaid), that’s $400 billion - with a “b” - of taxpayer money being eaten up by fraud.

Read The Whole Thing.

==+++++==


You know they’re in trouble when even Bill Maher says they’re too biased.

It seems that both NPR and PBS have gone too far when even members of the Left are saying so. In this case it’s comedian Bill Maher pointing the finger at both tax-funded broadcasters.

Maher recently blasted the two networks for their extreme bias. “We’ve outgrown the era where these outlets made sense,” Maher said on his HBO show, Real Time.

“In a country this polarized, where Republicans and Democrats see each other as existential threats, there’s no room for government-funded media that clearly favors one side.”

Maher also blasted NPR CEO Katherine Maher.

“I also read my namesake, Katherine Maher — head of NPR — and, you know, she said, ‘We’re completely unbiased.’ Give me a break, lady,” Maher added.

“I mean, they’re crazy far left. So, I mean, I think we’re past, my view, we’re past the age really, where the government, first of all, why do we need to subsidize — why can’t we have outlets like this and we’re so polarized,” he added. “These outlets became popular at a time when Republicans and Democrats didn’t hate each other and weren’t at each other’s throats and didn’t think each other was an existential threat in that world. You can’t have places like this I think anymore; they have to be private.”

I agree.

Ironically, they don’t receive as much funding from the government as they have in the past, percentage-wise. They still are funded by the public through membership drives and grants. However, I have to agree with Bill Maher that maybe it’s time to stop using taxpayer money to fund media outlets that are openly hostile to the half of the population that disagrees with their political viewpoints.

==+++++==


It is understood that elections have consequences and it looks like the taxpayers in Los Angeles are going to be feeling the effects of this past one, in this case one that affects their pocketbooks.

Consumers in Los Angeles County were shocked Tuesday as a new quarter-percent sales tax, ostensibly to raise funds for services for the homeless, went into effect following a referendum in November.

L.A. voters passed Measure A, which replaced and increased an earlier county-wide sales tax for the homeless. That tax, passed a decade ago, failed to stem the growth of the homeless population and may even have encouraged it.

L.A. residents recently learned that $2.3 billion spent on homeless services in Los Angeles had been unaccounted for — and the money had come from the same sales taxes that referendums like Measure A had been designed to fund.

How does the old saw go? “Subsidize something and you’ll get more of it. Tax something and you’ll get less of it.” In this case they’ve thrown money at dealing with homelessness...and ended up getting even more homelessness. Now they’re going to throw even more money at the problem and keep raising taxes to fund it all. It sounds like a vicious cycle to me.

==+++++==


This was the perfect imagery:

Getting Rid of DEI Is Like “Getting Soap Out Of A Sponge”

“Trump is now squeezing that sponge and a lot of the easy stuff is coming out now…. But DEI is going to persist for the foreseeable future… Do this for six to 10 years. and I think you will deal mortal damage to DEI. Do it for two to three years, and they will hang on, like survivors clinging to a lifeboat, just waiting for help to arrive.”

HehTM

==+++++==


When I read this I thought it might be a late April Fool’s prank...but it’s not.

It turns out that Democrats used to be all for tariffs until they were against them. What’s the difference between then and now?

I would have to say it’s those who are proposing them.

For five decades, politicians on both sides, but primarily Democrats and Independents, have called for America to take steps to equalize the “Free Trade,” which was not free or working for America. There is a video of Nancy Pelosi calling for tariffs against China in the 90s. Obama placed tariffs on Chinese auto tires during his term while Bernie Sanders urged Obama and Bush to even the playing field with tariffs against any country over-taxing us with double-digit tariffs or taxes. Even Joe Biden, or whoever was actually President, used tariffs.

Now that Donald Trump is taking tariffs to a new level with a wide-scale policy against nearly every country charging us unreasonable tariffs, Democrats are now apoplectic about how Trump’s economic plan is going to cause widespread inflation and layoffs.

Where were these people when it was Democrats pushing for these kinds of tariffs? Oh, wait. It was the same people, but they’re against them now because it’s not them – Democrats - pushing for those same tariffs.

==+++++==


And that’s the news from Lake Winnipesaukee where the rain has ended (for now), the sun is peaking out now and then, and where Monday is just around the corner...again.

UPDATE: UConn Women's Basketball team won the NCAA championship!

4/05/2025

They Got It Wrong

I have been watching (and reading) some of the reports about the protests against tariffs and other Trump actions. That doesn’t bother me as it’s everyone’s right to protest, whether I (and others) agree or disagree with them. I can’t tell from what reports I’ve seen how many have been at the protests.

However, the one thing I noticed was quite a few signs stating that Trump and DOGE would be cutting Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits. That is partially true, but not the way I think these protesters are implying.

Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid benefits will be cut...for those who aren’t eligible for them, receiving them fraudulently. That includes those who are well over 120 years of age, illegal immigrants who aren’t eligible , and ‘ghost’ recipients who are collecting benefits for multiple people who are deceased, i.e. their deaths were never reported to federal government. The fraudulent payments are projected to total in the billions of dollars which means those who are receiving the benefits due to them are being ripped off.

Either those making these claims about cut in benefits to legitimate recipients are believing this erroneous information or are lying themselves.

I am not focusing on the tariff issue as I have already made my opinion about them known. But I am going to add this one last thing about DOGE that I saw elsewhere:

It’s wild to see people who have been robbing us blind trying to justify being upset at us catching them.

Is DOGE the only way we can get our federal spending under control? I hate having to say this, but it may be our last hope. Congress certainly isn’t going to do it as they have no real incentive to do so. Too many in Congress are compromised, not because they are evil but more that they ‘owe’ others ‘favors’ in exchange for helping them get elected. Some are evil, seeing the budget as a means of filling their pockets and those of their friends and families. I wish it weren’t so, but there are far too many members of Congress that have become quite wealthy, taking in far more money than their salaries and speaking fees can account for.

Call me cynical...because I am.