I showed that Lake Winnipesaukee had a lot more ice than we thought when the snow started accumulating on that ‘invisible’ ice. It was quite evident this morning as I was out running my usual Sunday morning pre-church errands. With the exception of some patches here and there, there was ice shore to shore, even in an area of the lake known as The Broads. The Broads are usually the last area to freeze over every winter, but there was a lot of ice there this morning.
One thing that delayed ice formation was the heavy winds that visited us over the past week. Those winds broke up what ice did form and piled it up against the eastern shores of the various islands, bays, and coves around the lake facing the main body of the lake.
Despite our weather we are suffering a snow deficit up here in the Northeast. The jet stream which usually steers snowstorms our way has shifted such that rather than directing storms up along the East Coast it sends them out to sea. It also means that areas of the mid-Atlanfic coast and down into northern Florida see snow, in some cases seeing snowfalls that we would normally expect to see up here.
==+++++==
As the saying goes, what goes around comes around. And so it is with the consequences of the L.A. wildfires and the conditions that led to them being so devastating.
Unlike some of the other wildfires that have taken place in California, the L.A. wildfires have struck the elite just as much as it has the “little people” (meaning working folks like the rest of us) and in this case that devastation can be laid at the feet of blue misrule.
Comedian Billy Crystal lost his home — all but its tennis court — in Pacific Palisades.There were so many opportunities for those in charge to take measures that would have reduced the chances of wildfires like those still burning in Los Angeles. That also applies to most of the wildfires experienced in California. The question now is whether the Powers That Be will actually do anything or whether they will maintain the insane status quo. I’m guessing it will be the latter.
The homes of actors Anthony Hopkins, Miles Teller and John Goodman were wiped out there, too.
Heiress Paris Hilton said she saw her luxe Malibu vacation house “burn to the ground on live TV.”
It’s unpleasant to talk about the politics that led to the loss of entire neighborhoods, but it’s necessary to examine the terrible policies that led to this preventable disaster.
After over a decade of one-party rule, California has become the testing ground for the left’s most extreme ideas — and we are seeing the results in real time now.
Whether it was cutting the budget of fire departments, not refilling the reservoirs, ignoring deforesting guidelines under pressure from environmentalists or simply deflecting blame, California’s leaders are agonizingly inept — and it shows.
==+++++==
If this were to happen, it wouldn’t surprise me.
Biden May Blanket Pardon Those Who Targeted Trump and Those Who Weaponized Government
Joe Biden was asked yesterday if he would pardon anyone else. He couched his response, “it depends on some of the language and expectations that Trump broadcasts in the last couple days here as to what he’s going to do,” Biden told reporters at the White House. “There’s still consideration of some folks, but no decision.”So Biden (or WRBA) will try to take the wind out of Trump’s sails if he decides to go after the cabal’s henchmen for trying to railroad him into prison and impoverish him as well? Not that it would stop Trump from having them investigated and exposed for their machinations. I am not sure on the law when it comes to civil law, but does a presidential pardon absolve such miscreants from being sued in civil court by an injured party?
Now, think carefully about that response to the question. Biden handing out more pardons depends on what Donald Trump says he is going to do.
What exactly is the negotiating factor here? If Trump says he will hold people accountable for the weaponization of government, then Biden will preemptively pardon them. However, if President Trump does not say they will be held accountable, then no preemptive action is needed.
==+++++==
Hmm. This sounds intriguing.
Could it be that Donald Trump wasn’t just blowing smoke when it comes to Greenland? After much back and forth and speculation about that arctic land as well as the dismissive rhetoric from a lot of Democrats in the US, it seems Trump may be on to something, particularly in light of Greenland’s Prime Minister Egede is “ready to speak with Trump as ‘the status quo is no longer an option‘.”
…Egede said that “the status quo is not an option” as he laid out the desire of the vast and geopolitically crucial island of 57,000 to have “its own voice” by gaining independence from Denmark and turning down Trump’s attempts to buy Greenland.Does this mean that he thinks Trump may be able to help Greenland achieve its independence? That would certainly be a ‘feather in his cap’ if Trump could do so while also making ties between Greenland and the US even closer. Might this be what he’s actually be working towards?
“We don’t want to be Danish, we don’t want to be American, we want to be Greenlandic,” he told a news conference on Friday. Denmark’s Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said at the same meeting that Greenland’s desire for independence was “legitimate and understandable”, while calling US interest in the autonomous territory “positive”.
==+++++==
From the “Just When I Thought They Couldn’t Get Stupider” Department comes this:
Environmental Experts To Rip Out Trees, Build Solar Electric Plant In Snow Belt To “Save The Environment”
So in some kind of backroom deal, Michigan’s Department of Natural Resources decided to auction off 420 acres of State forest on which a solar plant will be constructed. After the trees are cut down. The idea is to “save the environment”. Which you have to admit is a great joke.Solar, particularly large scale solar in places that far north that also have a lot of snowfall, don’t make sense to me. While where I live is just north of the 43rd parallel, we don’t see a lot of large scale solar here either for many of the same reasons. My state is over 80% forested and like the Gaylord, Michigan project it would require cutting down a lot of trees. It’s counterintuitive to cut down trees that are effective carbon sinks and replace them with something that will increase greenhouse gases.
It becomes a knee-slapper when you learn that solar plants result in a net increase in “greenhouse gases”.
--snip--
...Otsego county has about 26,000 people, and Gaylord itself is about 4,400. Gaylord has the largest snowfall in the lower Peninsula, a marvelous area for winter sports: I did a lot of cross-country skiing. Besides snow, except in the two to two-and-a-half month summer, there is not a lot of sun, and what little of it there is does not come direct, because the town is at the 45th parallel.
During a back-of-the-envelope calculation about how much land area solar would be required here in New Hampshire to replace the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant, it came to approximately 120 square miles plus a lot of storage in order to provide the 1300MW of power generated 24/7/365 by Seabrook. At a minimum that would mean at least 96 square miles of forest would need to be cut down to provide the space needed for all those solar panels.
A note from the author of the linked post: I wrote the post...before learning the company that wanted the DNR’s land backed out (yesterday); however, the DNR has similar plans for other plots of land...so the details...still have value.
==+++++==
And that’s the news from Lake Winnipesaukee, where we’re watching the ice cover increasing, waiting for the winds to pick up again, and for the snows to return.